On 11/2/13 11:48 AM, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
On 11/02/2013 12:46 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 11/2/13 10:50 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> مصعب الزعبي wrote:
>>> Then do new rule to write "proxies" instead of proxy, at Fedora
packaging
>>> guidlines.
>>
>> Renaming packages, censoring descriptions etc. in Fedora at the whims of
>> governments (of countries Fedora isn't supposed to be exported to in the
>> first place) is not going to happen. Sorry.
>>
>> Kevin Kofler
>>
>
> I think your answer conflates two issues.
>
> If Syria is on the export control list, there's really no further discussion
> to be had.
>
> But I wonder how many i.e. school nanny-filters ban URLs with the word
> "proxy," and how that impacts the ability of users in any country to
obtain
> Fedora.
>
> The idea of an alternate URL using package hashes seemed reasonable to me,
> to route around that sort of internet damage.
>
> -Eric
>
I think the solution in this case, that would require zero change to
package names, and likely little else, would be to offer a way to choose
only those repos that offer an https interface.
If that works, sure. (I didn't read the whole thread, didn't realize that
it solved the problem.)
-Eric