On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:31:25AM -0500, Benjamin Kreuter wrote:
>> I can think of a good reason for a separate /home: upgrade paths. I know we
>> are getting better at it, but it can still be problematic if one tries to
>> install over a previous installation, and it is usually pretty smooth to just
>> format / while leaving /home intact.
>
> +1
But that means you need to guess relative sizes for / and /home or offer
some understandable choices.
That is obvious. And better to offer few choices than only one if possible.
Valent.
--
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter,
http://counter.li.org.
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic