On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 12:06:40 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
On Monday, January 2, 2017 3:47:52 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Monday, January 2, 2017 2:40:34 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Also, the question is whether it isn't really glibc bug, because
> > schedulers non-ppc64le architectures look to be more "fair"
regardless
> > the default.
>
> Sorry, not really -- at least i686 (build cross-compiled from x86_64
> probably) is also affected:
>
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17147577
It is nice to see that the build finished in the end (even though it took ~2
days). So not really infinite ...
... but what worries me is that both builds, even this one,
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17147897
finished almost at the same time; both tests took about 48 hours?
Is there some timeout, signal, or scheduler attempt to change something after 48
hours? :)
Pavel
FTR, I just filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410052
Who knows, maybe that could move this forward.
That's a result of gnulib discussion:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2017-01/msg00009.html
Pavel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org