On 05/31/2012 09:34 AM, Gerry Reno wrote:
On 05/31/2012 12:22 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 05/31/2012 12:11 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> This is a monopolistic attack disguised as a security effort.
>
> The argument that it's a security effort is bolstered in many vendors eyes
> by the existence of attacks in the wild which Secure Boot would prevent.
>
SecureBoot should only be Default:ON for Microsoft OS's and any other OS's that
want to deal with that
and should be Default:OFF for all others.
Pretty sure it doesn't work that way. It can be on or off for a
machine, not per-OS.
--
Help me fight child abuse:
http://tinyurl.com/jlkcourage
- jlk