On 01/25/2013 12:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 23:03 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> It's best to rip the bandage of this in one release.
>
> The churn from this should have been more or less covered when we
> implement biosdevname so the fallout from this change should be minimal
> if any...
I see the 's' word in there ;)
That's always the hope, and then we meet the cold reality, where someone
just patched 'em1' into everything and hoped that was good enough. But
sure, 'damn the torpedoes' is a viable approach too. I guess I was just
kind of hoping F19 would be a release without yet more churn in the core
system where we could try and stabilize things a bit.
I agree. The scope says no impact, but who knows how many packages
depend on hardcoded names.
Marcela