Excellent suggestion!

In fact, as part of the CI Objective we want to enable more such distribution-wide tests, such as rpminspect [0], installability and reverse dependency testing. The tests that have been run by Fedora QA are also being evaluated and those will be used directly or migrated.

At flock yesterday we had some good discussions on how to make opt-in more accessible, and I'm sure the Fedora CI SIG will take your suggestions into consideration. We all agree the current way of doing it isn't quite optimal. :)

Stay tuned in the coming weeks to hear more about how to opt into gating!

Thanks,
-Dominik



[0] https://github.com/dcantrell/rpminspect


On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 9:59 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi All,

So what I've been reading from the rawhide gating mailthread,
creating the gating rules unfortunately is somewhat convoluted /
involved.

As such I was wondering if maybe it is an idea to automatically
enabled the rpmlint gating test for packages which have a
<packagename>.rpmlint rc. ?

Alternatively a wiki page with gating confif snippets, mirroring
how have a wiki page for specfile scriptlet snippets, might be a
good idea. I would like to opt in to test-gating where possible,
esp. with the rpmlint tests, but I do not have a lot of time to
spend on this. More in general I believe that the easier this
is made to use, the better chances are that people will actually
use this.

Regards,

Hans
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org