Peter Robinson (pbrobinson(a)gmail.com) said:
> At least for aircrack-ng from your list no FTBFS bug has been
filed,
> therefore I do not see any reason to remove it from Fedora. And in case
> it really does not build, I expect a bug report.
There hasn't been FTBFS bug reports since Matt stopped doing them due
to lack of time, the maintainer would have got failed builds for the
mass rebuild and should have investigated as part of "maintaining" the
package.
If there aren't FTBFS bug reports in the future, that's going to make
doing FTBFS-blocking tricky. Did you generate your list merely from
"things with older dist tags, so they obviously didn't rebuild", or from
some more canonical source?
Bill