Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Why do you claim that? What requirements do you think we must
provide
for in our default browser that other browser we have packages for
don't meet? I find Midori reasonable on x86_64. There is currently an
i686 problem because a library it uses is compiled with an incorrect
architecure (it uses instructions that aren't supported on hardware
Fedora is upposed to support). So I have problems with it on i686, but
this isn't directly a Midori problem. Seamonkey seems pretty reasonable
as well.
That's a webkitgtk issue, look at how we handle this in QtWebKit.
(You have to build the library twice, as /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk* with the
WebKit JIT disabled and as /usr/lib/sse2/libwebkitgtk* with the JIT enabled.
The WebKit JavaScript JIT requires SSE2. The interpreter works fine without
it.)
Kevin Kofler