On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 00:15 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:09:07PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I think that wrapping up ruby and python packages into rpms seems
> to be of
> dubious benefit. These projects have their own package management
> systems
> (that at least in ruby's case can handle multiple versions). I'm
> very much
> tempted to get out of the business of packaging these things and
> just let
> people use the upstream language tools. What does Fedora users
> gain with "dnf
> install rails" or "dnf install ipython" versus "gem install
rails"
> and "pip
> install ipython"?
Not entirely on the topic but for pip we should for one recommend
using twine
instead of pip:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/twine
er...that doesn't sound anything like a pip alternative?
"Currently it only supports uploading distributions."
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net