On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Dan Williams <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 13:59 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Dan Williams (email@example.com) said:
> > > 'After netfs' should be good enough. Although netfs stop should possibly
> > > do lazy umounts.
> > Ok, just need to bump NM a few bits later it looks like; might as well
> > be K84 to be right after messagebus.
> Well, NM will exit anyway when the messagebus exits, will it not?