On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:03:54AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 12:53 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> Some fallback (like an init script) should be included in any case,
> since some installations will obviously not be using NetworkManager.
> NM, when in use, can certainly push updated regulatory settings when
> necessary, over and above what the init script would do.
>
> So we should really have both.
And if the system isn't going to use wireless at all, why spend the
bootup time to set something that will be of no use?
I don't think we said we would do that. There are many ways to solve
the problem while serving users.
Here is my question: If we can provide a simple solution almost
effortlessly, why tell anyone that might deviate from the otherwise
approved configuration "suck it, roll your own"?
John
--
John W. Linville Linux should be at the core
linville(a)redhat.com of your literate lifestyle.