On May 21, 2008, Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ok, then I'll call it an alternate kernel package. Which we
still
aren't going to allow.
However doing that with an alternative kernel
package isn't something that sits well.
I'm talking about having any alternate kernel, period.
I have never opposed the idea of replacing the non-Free kernel Fedora
ships today with linux-libre or any of its predecessors. I just
thought proposing it as an alternative that I offered to maintain
myself would generate less heat. Maybe I was mistaken.
--
Alexandre Oliva
http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Free Software Evangelist oliva(a){lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
FSFLA Board Member ¡Sé Libre! =>
http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva(a){redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}