On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 11:09 +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
There's a good reason we have the change deadlines we do - and
honestly I think dropping a subpackage (as opposed to retiring which
is more visible) is sufficiently disruptive (and annoyingly invisible
otherwise) that it should go through the Change process.
It wouldn't be remotely viable to have a Change for every dropped
subpackage. It'd completely overwhelm the process.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net