On Sunday, December 09, 2012 12:12 AM, Arun SAG wrote:
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel
<clydekunkel7734(a)verizon.net <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>> wrote:
>I imagine it boils down to money since Fedora=free and RHEL=$$$.
Corporate suits will will weigh cost >of Fedora support vs RHEL
support and decide accordingly.
>Or if money is an issue use Centos.
Not really! We are already a customer of RHEL. Money is not the problem.
We want our users to use the latest software out there but we also want
to reduce the upgrade cycle.
You CANNOT disturb every developer in a company to upgrade his box every
You don't have to upgrade every 6 months.
I'm still running Fedora 16 at work because I haven't had time to upgrade.