On Fri, 24.04.09 23:48, David Woodhouse (dwmw2(a)infradead.org) wrote:
I don't think we're just going to decide that Fedora
doesn't care about
these users -- and from what I saw today I don't think it's likely that
the PA folks will decide that they _do_ care.
So it looks like if we keep PulseAudio as the core around which Fedora
audio support is based, we're _always_ going to need to keep something
extra to fill the functionality gap.
Oh great. This sounds like an invitation to stop working on cleaning
up the volume control situation entirely. If we never can get rid of
the old cruft and need to prominently feature it in all future release
then why even try?
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553
http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4