On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:52:40 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > if akira is not taking care of the package, and if we
include sylpheed
> > in FC2, I'd like to take it. Seems like a harmless enough exercise,
> > it cannot be worse than having a dead maintainer, right?
>
> how is the set of packages that is to be included in fc2 to be
> determined?
>
> is there a raffle? Can I put 2 bits down on something? :)
> seriously - how do we tell?
sylpheed is on the list because it was there before.
Though, unfortunately, it's built without GPG support due to lack of GPGME
packages in Fedora Core.
My attempt at providing a GPG-enabled Sylpheed at fedora.us has failed
long ago due to lack of interest.
--