On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 01:20:26AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Matthew Garrett
> Maintaining software in general is a burden, but we do it for the
> benefit of our users anyway. The best case scenario would certainly be
> for Google to update their packages, but if they don't then how does
> rendering the package uninstallable benefit our users who want to
> install it?
I don't think they "don't" if you could give google-chrome-unstable a
I don't follow. My understanding was that all the Chrome builds were
generic RPMs rather than tracking a specific branch of Fedora, so how
does the rate of development releases do anything to help us get them to
update their packages to build against a more recent gcrypt?
Matthew Garrett | mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org