On Thursday 04 March 2010 15:01:29 Juha Tuomala wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> You mean the KDE stability proposal? As this is F11, i.e. "previous
> stable", KDE 4.4 would actually not have been pushed to F11 under that
> proposal.
How i read it, you would still push *one* feature release in the
middle of stable release lifespan, right?
How that's going to solve anything as upstream *intentionally* pushes
stuff into it to break things? Even they don't expect you to do what
you do.
People who wants stability would be in time of this push to Fn still running
Fn-1. Only people who wants new features would be running Fn. There's no sense
to have two frozen releases out there! We can just support one for 12
months...
I personally think that update every 6 months breaks much more stuff so letting
users to stays as much time with older but still supported releases is what we
really want.
Tuju
--
Ajatteleva ihminen tarvitsee unta.
--
Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik(a)redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 731 455 332
Red Hat, Inc.
http://cz.redhat.com/