On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:56:01 -0400
Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:51:55 -0400
seth vidal <skvidal(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> that's fine by me - but I don't think removing /srv from filesystem
> pkg makes any sense.
Doesn't make sense to me either, I hope I didn't sound otherwise.
+1 to keeping /srv
-1 to allowing any package to put any content in /srv
Whether or not you agree with the FHS, it does make some useful points. Following it as a
recommendation or guideline seems like the best idea.
I've viewed /srv as another /usr/local, but without a vendor-provided directory
structure. Other than it existing as a top level directory, we shouldn't do anything
with it. The only argument I can see to that is where do we stop we top level provided
directories? I think /srv is reasonable as an example and admins can take it from there.
Packages shouldn't dump anything in there.
On another note, could we please stop the +1 and -1 garbage replies to people? Just say
you agree or disagree. Where did the +1 and -1 trend come from because it's really
freaking annoying.
--
David Cantrell <dcantrell(a)redhat.com>
Red Hat / Westford, MA