On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 15:04 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On 1 Jun 2011 21:54, "Ville Skyttä" <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi> wrote:
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
>
> I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default
install. In
> my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and
with my
> upstream hat on I expect things to further improve before F-16 is
out.
>
> Why I'm writing here is that I'd like to hear opinions to which
> default-installed comps group should it be added (and set as default
> there) - in my opinion the serious candidates are admin-tools and
base.
> admin-tools doesn't sound right because bash-completion is not
really
> an admin tool (unless one considers interactive shell usage as admin
> activity in general), so I'm inclined to add it to base.
>
> Thoughts?
Things like bash completion have massive performance implications on
network and other slower file systems esp if its used for home
directories. It certainly shouldn't be in base.
+1 - I've found the impact of bash completion on disconnected machines
to be negative. I don't install it anymore for that reason.
-sv