On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:24:05PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:14:24PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
>> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> > I was working on adding 2 more SOC's for packagers earlier this week.
>> > I wanted to see how much call there was for these... should I try and
>> > make them accessable by all packagers? Or just have a group and
>> > interested people could be added to that group?
>> I for one would like to have access to some ARM systems for trying
>> things out. At least one for each arch that's a candidate to become
>> primary would be nice.
> I appreciate that some people cannot or don't want to buy hardware,
> but if you did have roughly $300 available, then you should probably
> get the Oct 2012 Samsung Chromebook or the Arndale development board.
> The Chromebook has the advantage IMHO that it's a decent netbook.
$45 will get your a beaglebone which the last of the core support has
landed in 3.11 and I'm testing the kernel now and there should be a
F-19 remix soon...
But no hardware virtualization right? I think the minimum we should
target for Fedora development machines is whatever supports hardware
virtualization, which is A-15 IIRC.
However a $45 option *is* good for people on limited budgets or people
who want to play with ARM but don't care about virtualization.
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org