On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 08:50 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Please wait until I am finished working on it. This is not a bug
that
can be easily reproduced.
I note that this is fixed in -7: thanks. However, checking how it was
fixed was rather painful...
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=d05dd853...
...since it seems like all Fedora patching of glibc is done in a single
giant patch, and that patch gets a ton of changes with every update, as
the whole thing is rediffed.
Is there a specific reason glibc does this? Can it not have a set of
patches, one per change, as is usual practice?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net