On Thu, 26 May 2022 at 11:32, Kevin P. Fleming <kpfleming@redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/26/22 11:06, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> 2. Are there ways that a non-TCK compliant version could be distributed?

I would suggest phrasing that slightly differently: the version being
distributed could very well be fully compliant (would pass the TCK if
tested), but may not have been tested.


Yes, that goes into the my misunderstanding of what TCK is. Some systems can only say they are 'compliant' if they are 'certified' and anything else is 'fraudulent'. Others allow for 'complaint' and 'certified' to be different.

In either case, I should have clarified with  'certified'.
 
--
Kevin P. Fleming
He/Him/His
Principal Program Manager, RHEL
Red Hat US/Eastern Time Zone
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren