2010/6/9 Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com>:
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 23:21 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:10 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 00:56 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > I will work with Ankur Sinha and probably do this for Rawhide in the
> > > next couple of days. Peter Gordon, let me know if you have any
objections
> >
> > This sounds good to me - please go ahead with your changes.
> >
> > (Apologies about the unavailability over the past several weeks. Final
> > projects and trips with family/friends have consumed most of my time.
> > I'm back and ready to rock some Fedora packages, though! ^_~)
>
> hey,
>
> I've made some kinda spec splitting the package into sub packages.
> Please have a look at the spec[1]. It builds in mock. The build logs etc
> are here[2]
>
> Please let me know if(when) you think up of changes ;)
>
> regards,
> Ankur
>
> [1]
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/deluge/deluge.spec
> [2]
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/deluge/
Updated spec to handle conflicts etc. Hope thats how its to be done.
regards,
Ankur
--
I think image subpackage is not needed, maybe it can merged to
-common subpackage, also if you should not provide Provides: %{name}
= %{version}-%{release} or Provides: %{name}-flags =
%{version}-%{release} in spec.
Obseletes is enough to provide a sane upgrade path, Provides is
needed for renaming a package, but it's not suitable in the case of
spliting one package into several subpackages.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitt...
Chen Lei