Jan Zelený píše v St 30. 01. 2013 v 08:22 +0100:
On 29. 1. 2013 at 19:18:32, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Jan Zelený <jzeleny(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 28. 1. 2013 at 14:28:06, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >> Michael Scherer (misc(a)zarb.org) said:
> >> > Le lundi 28 janvier 2013 à 15:27 +0100, Jan Zelený a écrit :
> >> > > Currently we are working on some proof-of-concept stuff. But as
an
> >> > > example, you can imagine a script for creation of C program
> >> > > templates.
> >> > > You will specify directory where it should create the program
and
> >> > > (possibly) some specifics, like "I want to use threads"
or "I need
> >> > > glib
> >> > > support".
> >> > >
> >> > > On output of that script you will have a template of C program
with
> >> > > Makefile and you can start coding right away, no need for
preparing
> >> > > the
> >> > > environment first.
> >> >
> >> > Something like
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Quickly ?
> >> >
> >> > Some work have been started by Mathieu bridon and Didier Roche for
> >> > quickly on Fedora a few years ago. Not sure where it went, but this
> >> > would be easier to use it rather than start from scratch.
> >>
> >> Do we know whether our target users for these quick-onroad scripts are
> >> using the commandline vs something like Eclipse? Just curious where the
> >> bang-for-the-buck is.
> >
> > Actually we want to address both. Use cases for Eclipse users will be
> > addressed in second stage of the project, hopefully utilizing whatever we
> > produce.
>
> Eclipse already has some of this, see e.g.
>
http://wiki.eclipse.org/CDT/Autotools/User_Guide .
I thought so, even though I didn't do much research on this front. Thanks for
the link, I'll check it out.
assistant" so IMHO it would be hard to come up with an universal
concept. And not everyone uses Eclipse ...
Dan