On Apr 23, 2016 09:18, "Florian Weimer" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 08/13/2015 03:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 10:47 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:40:28AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>>>> "Ambivalent" is probably understated here. It's hard to imagine
>>>> people securing i686 hardware these days to run a Workstation
>>>> experience, after all.
>>> The question, I think, is how much we want to prioritize the
>>> "Workstation experience" on older hardware (or on devices like the
>>> Baytrail tablets).
>> Just to this point - if we wanted to support the Baytrail tablets
>> properly we should probably get 64-on-32 working. Allowing 32-bit UEFI
>> installs probably isn't something we want to do officially.
> Has this changed due to IoT?
I am not sure there has been a very large amount of people interested in doing the work or looking at IoT on i386 since the majority of the hardware is arm and has no eufi
> devel mailing list