On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 09:30:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 10:48 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 10/26/2011 10:45 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > I forgot to add that it's probably a good idea to recompile any
> > package that was compiled against the -13 glibc package.
> >
> > Strictly speaking, any package that uses a function that is defined
> > with __THROW or __NTH in the glibc header files, but it's probably
> > easier to compile every package.
> >
> > Is there a Koji query to get a list of such packages?
>
> which means delay f16, create a stable glibc, test it, then make a
> massrebuild and test again the result...
Richard, could you please open a FESCo ticket with as much information
as you have on this issue? This is something we need to track closely, I
think.
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/682
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog:
http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora