On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 04:01:15PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> > That's the point. You don't get to be a primary architecture until
> > you've demonstrated that doing so won't slow down the other
> > architectures
> Is that "you don't get to be a primary architecture unless you have
> demonstrated that nobody outside of the ARM SIG needs to do any work
> on the architecture" == "you don't get to be a primary architecture
> unless it doesn't matter whether you are a primary architecture"?
Promotion is supposed to benefit Fedora, not the architecture being
Yes, but that is _net_ benefit (benefit - cost). Requiring zero cost
to Fedora doesn't follow from that.