On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Jonathan Underwood
<jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Would it not be best to have the default package using the default
CFLAGS for consistency with the rest of the distribution, and the
subpackages being variants which override the CFLAGS?
This is a different issue altogether. Even if atlas is made to used
the default CFLAGS, it will still attempt to build for a particular
CPU (either for the archictetural default passed to it at build time
or the hardware on which it is being built), that's how the package
was designed.
Deji
Jonathan
ps. Any recent thoughts on BZ 478856?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list