On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 14:00 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>> "HdG" == Hans de Goede
<j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl> writes:
HdG> Well the question here IMHO is not so much how to name the
HdG> package as it is which fork to package, making them parallel
HdG> installable will be very hard todo and AFAIK we don't want
HdG> conflicting packages.
HdG> I believe that hylafax+ best fits Fedora.
I don't see any point in attempting to decide which of many choices
fits Fedora; hylafax+ is simply the only one that's been submitted.
ACK.
For comparison, Debian and Ubuntu don't seem to ship hylafax+;
they
ship hylafax and in addition split the package into -client, -server
and -doc subpackages (which may be worth considering here).
Gentoo has ebuilds for both hylafax and hylafax+ named accordingly.
I'm not sure how to check Suse.
SuSE ships "hylafax", originating
from
www.hylafax.org's hylafax-4.*
tarballs with many patches having been added.
Ralf