On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 00:17, Jos Vos wrote:
> Those files do not have a package of their own, instead they
blend into
> the XML::SAX::PurePerl package. And perl allows one to use() them using
> the fully qualified, "fake" package name (based on the dir structure, I
> believe).
What about packaging XML-SAX-PurePerl? Shouldn't that solve the
problem?
Hm, by XML::SAX::PurePerl "package" I meant the Perl module
"namespace",
not a RPM or any other package. And the PurePerl modules are already
part of the XML-SAX CPAN distribution. Or did I miss something here?
I have to admit I don't know much about this area, but
I needed XML-SAX because it is required by XML-LibXML.
Good luck! Tried it too and had to give up because of (IIRC) some
libxml2 weirdness/incompatibilities (RHL9); "make test" resulted in
segfaults, be sure to run it :)
(libxml2 2.5.4 isn't explicitly listed in
http://search.cpan.org/src/PHISH/XML-LibXML-1.54/README but 2.5.5 is
"known as broken"...)
--
\/