On Tuesday 27 January 2004 02:14, Warren Togami wrote:
No. We have thoroughly examined all alternatives to CVS and found
each
to be either lacking in necessary features, not mature enough, not free
enough, or too inefficient.
I assume it's on the list, correct? I'll do my homework tonight to see how it
went.
Subversion I recall fit into the "too inefficient"
category.
Do SVN people know about that? They have been pretty helpful in the past and
they have a fairly aggressive development cycle (maybe a bit too aggressive
IMHO esp. when it comes to backward compatibility ;-) . Has anyone showed
them where their product is flawed?
--
Alexander L. Belikoff GPG f/pr: 0D58 A804 1AB1 4CD8 8DA9
Bloomberg L.P. 424B A86E CD0D 8424 2701
abel *at* vallinor4 *dot* com (
http://pgp5.ai.mit.edu for the key)