----- Original Message -----
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Michael Catanzaro
<mike.catanzaro(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Perhaps the update policy should have a guideline on the minimum
> amount
> of information required in this description. E.g. "update to latest
> upstream version" might be a perfectly acceptable description for
> Fedora
> given the fast pace of updates, but I don't think users should ever
> be
> seeing "no update information available" and especially not "here
> is
> where you give an explanation of your update." (And I've seen this
> one
> multiple times within the past couple of weeks.)
I tend to agree here. That being said, most of my package updates
are
something along the lines of "Update to upstream 2.5 release" --
would
you find that descriptive enough, or still lacking in detail?
From the time, Kevin sent me a message in a style of "One more
such
update description and I'll will come to Brno to k*ll you" I'm
trying to provide better description. But it really depends on
quality of upstream Changelogs. Sometimes it's just really hard
to write more than "update to latest upstream version x.y" :(
Jaroslav
--
Jared Smith
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel