On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 14:40 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
On 10/14/2015 02:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The only thing that concerns me is that at that point we'd have the
> thing, IRC, Ask, *and* the mailing lists, soon with Hyperkitty
> which in
> some senses overlaps with all the others.
> All of these are good things but would we have a coherent story
> why we had all of them, and would it just make it a nightmare to
> the right information / person?
So the intention with hubs is that it would have a web based chat
interface that would use IRC. So if you prefer your old IRC client,
using it; if you're a newbie and not familiar with IRC and want to
communicate with Fedora folks, use Hubs chat (which is actually just
same IRC channels under the covers.)
Same thing with mailing lists / hyperkitty. If you prefer mailing
fine, stick with mutt or pine or $CLIENT_OF_CHOICE. If you're not
mailing lists you can read the messages and engage in convo directly
the hubs interface (we'll probably embed pieces of hyperkitty to do
We haven't thought too much about ask integration with hubs yet bc
was a GSoC project this summer to redesign the UI, but at some point
could integrate that too.
So the idea behind hubs is to enable folks who don't want to use the
services but still want to participate in Fedora to do so.
Does that make more sense / seem more coherent?
Oh, I wasn't criticizing the *current* plan, I was wondering whether if
we stuck another thing on top of the pile it might be going too far...
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net