On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 09:34 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote:
> 2013/2/1 Martin Sourada <martin.sourada(a)gmail.com>
> Yes, defaults needs to be sensible and usable and for many
> that's what they end up with. I'm not saying we should go
> and have AOO
> installed by default, but available in repos in a state that
> does not
> conflict with LO (and other office suites *in official
> repos*) ;-) Think
> about sysadmins, multi-user systems, ... Seeing a bug report
> saying "My
> LO Writer segfaults with this error while AOO is installed"
> exactly helpful, but not having AOO isn't a solution. Hence
> I say OK to
> adding AOO, as long as it wont conflict with LO both as
> package and in
> Unlike pulseaudio (in the above linked thread), AOO is
> end-user GUI application, not a
> used to get the wanted sound to your headphones (that by
> interferes with anything else trying to do the same) ;-) By
> adding AOO
> we're not breaking some third app, we might break LO and
> that's exactly
> what I consider critical not to do. Is it doable? Are there
> willing and able to do that? If yes, sure, let them.
> +1 Martin, that's the point.
No that's completely not the point:
Have you actually read what I wrote and what I was reacting to? Or have
I written it so bad to make it seem in conflict with what you linked?