-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/02/2014 11:40 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 02.05.14 10:53, Stephen Gallagher (sgallagh(a)redhat.com)
wrote:
>> He also writes "particularly since it appears to have been
>> developed without the input of the journald creators". The code
>> in question has been reviewed on the systemd mailing list, and
>> discussed internally. Also, although I didn't have anything to
>> do with initial journald creation, I have been one the people
>> handling bugs and adding features to it over the last two
>> years.
>
> This was an impression I got from the discussion thread up to
> that point. I didn't get a sense that the core journald
> developers were in agreement with this as the approach (and as
> noted above, it appeared that this was being pushed as the One
> True Way to do this).
Wut?
I think Zibigniew and I are actually very much on the same page.
Zbigniew is a systemd commiter, I trust him, and I think it's good
stuff he is doing. We have discussed the protocol choices many
times within the systemd community and we are all behind this
approach.
I am pretty sure HTTP(s) is the right choice, and that we cover
both push and pull models, and Zbigniew's brings us a good step
closer to that goal, even if it might not bring us all the way
there yet.
Sorry, I wasn't sufficiently clear when I said "up to that point". I
no longer feel that way.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlNjzLQACgkQeiVVYja6o6N+1wCggxEf0WKWHBk96gHAsQTnhUpS
JYoAn0AHqkoq7yZuYVUZinjTNosE5MxZ
=hEQh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----