On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 27 January 2015 at 10:15, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I might be asking a completely stupid question here...
>
> Why move production stuff over to dnf at all? Isn't dnf's goal in life to
> eventually become yum? If dnf is "good enough" to start using it in
> production, should the discussion be around dnf -> yum transition?
>
>
I think that was dropped a long time ago. dnf isn't going to become yum in
some sort of rename. It will be a seperate command and while its syntax
will be similar it is not 100% (eg you won't be able to use a yum plugin to
work with dnf)
Ahh, I hadn't seen that. Well, since the name is no longer temporary I
would like to say that it's a terrible name :)
Ok sorry for the noise, please continue.
Thanks,
Richard