On Mon, 20.06.11 10:40, Adam Williamson (awilliam(a)redhat.com) wrote:
On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 15:42 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> i need to be sorry because i never had thought that since "systemd" was
> planned for F14 and not ready it will be for F15, and ready is for me
> using it really as designed or delay the release again - it is unacceptable
> fpr a production-environment fire up services in random order :-(
You keep talking about 'random order' but I'm not sure this is accurate.
My understanding was that systemd respects the dependency information in
LSB-compliant headers and hence will fire these up in the correct order
as long as the dependencies are correct. If there are any LSB-type
headers with incorrect or incomplete dependency information, this is a
bug that *can* be fixed with updates to F15.
Yes, Adam, your understanding is correct.
I don't know if it respects the number-based ordering for
services which
simply don't include LSB-compliant dependency information at all.
Yes, it respects the number-based ordering between two services if
neither includes LSB information.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.