Hello everyone,
I would like to start a discussion about moving unversioned *.so files back
to unixODBC-devel package, as they are currently in the main package. The
reason for this discussion is primary have things in order according to
future rhel-9.
There will potentially be a change of moving 5 files {libodbc.so
libodbcinst.so libodbcpsqlS.so libodbcmyS.so libtdsS.so} to devel package,
so from the maintainers/users perspective, dependent packages will have to
require also the devel package and should be rebuild as well. No other
changes will be made.
There seemed to be no big reason for moving the libraries to the main
package in the past, so I consider f34 as a good candidate for such a
change. It would be great, if you share your opinions and concerns for
this topic.
Sharing also the official documentation [1], tracker in bugzilla [2] and
upcoming changes in unixODBC package [3]
Thanks!
Ondrej
[1]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_devel_packages
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877720
[3]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/odubaj/rpms/unixODBC/c/7ecddca7cfcc4e0...
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200930.0):
ID: 682197 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/682197
Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose