I reviewed the licensing of i2c-tools and found the License tags to be
inaccurate. I changed the tags as follows.
License tag changed from
GPLv2+ and Public Domain
License tag changed from
a recent F28 update build of poedit  shows the following message after starting:
Warning: Mismatch between the program and library build versions detected.
The library used 3.0 (wchar_t,compiler with C++ ABI 1012,wx containers,compatible with 2.8),
and your program used 3.0 (wchar_t,compiler with C++ ABI 1013,wx containers,compatible with 2.8).
poedit-2.1-1.fc28 has been built using gcc-c++ 8.1.1-5.fc28
wxGTK3-3.0.4-1.fc28 has been built using gcc-c++ 8.0.1-0.16.fc28
The above message disappears, when wxGTK3 is rebuilt using current gcc-c++ 8.1.1-5.fc28, which has just been tested using a rebuild of wxGTK3 on copr .
However, there are several other packages depending on wxGTK3 and it looks like this ABI mismatch issue in F28 needs some coordination to be solved for wxGTK3 and dependent packages.
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 17:59, Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I'm also interested.
> Jeff Ligon <jligon(a)redhat.com> writes:
> > I too would like to be a part of this but I’m not sure how much I’d be able to help.
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 1:29 PM Owen Taylor <otaylor(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > I'm interested in participating with a special interest in Flatpaks - the other type of Fedora container ;-) - I want to keep things aligned as much as possible. And also from the perspective of using containers for development within
> > Fedora Workstation.
> > I can contribute a certain familiarity with OCI images, OSBS, the image registry, etc.
> > Owen
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Clement Verna <cverna(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > Greeting all,
> > The container effort in Fedora has until now been looked after by the
> > Atomic WG, since this Working Group is now going to focus mostly on
> > Fedora CoreOS, I propose to create a new container SIG to regroup
> > people interested in the maintenance of application containers in
> > Fedora.
> > This SIG would look after the container guidelines , the container
> > review process  and also the release process and tooling.
> > Please Reply if you're interested with helping out making the
> > Container story great in Fedora. If there is a good response, I will
> > create a Container SIG wiki page, and I guess we can ask for
> > container-devel mailing list for SIG discussions.
> > Regards,
> > Clément
> >  - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Container:Guidelines
> >  - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Container:Review_Process
Thanks for all the responses and showing such a strong interest :). I
went ahead with creating a wiki page  and a project on pagure 
where we can start adding items we would to discuss or work on. I will
also request a new mailing list and will keep you updated once it is
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Container_SIG
 - https://pagure.io/ContainerSIG/container-sig