WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Next Steps ==
- I suggest copying first two paragrahps for our so called PRD from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud_PRD as was discussed two weeks ago.
- PRD - based on discussion on env-and-stacks mailing list
(some discussion on pad: http://piratepad.net/PwUiH4MEPR) If we don't
have any other input from other areas, we could sum up what we discussed
and create list of tasks for future work (Review tool, taskotron, ...).
== Open Floor ==
I'm trying to change a symlink to a directory but it's not working.
I've reduced the problem down to a simple test case.
creates the following:
* a directory /usr/share/javadoc/test-1 (named after the package version)
* a file within the test-1 directory
* /usr/share/javadoc/test, a symlink to test-1
In the next version:
the Javadoc directory is unversioned, so the 'test' symlink is now a
directory (containing one file). As expected the 1-1 to 1-2 upgrade
file /usr/share/javadoc/test from install of test-1-2.fc20.noarch
conflicts with file from package test-1-1.fc20.noarch
So in the next version:
a %pretrans scriptlet deletes /usr/share/javadoc/test, if it's a
symlink. However during the 1-1 to 1-3 upgrade, the old test-1
directory isn't deleted.
The verbose rpm output from this upgrade:
shows that rpm doesn't erase /usr/share/javadoc/test-1/hello. It does
seem to try to erase the /usr/share/javadoc/test-1 directory, but
can't because it still contains a file.
Does anyone have any idea what's going on here?
Sigh. Yes, another of these.
On 2013-12-18, tracker was bumped to 0.7.0:
the sonames of libtracker-extract, libtracker-miner and
libtracker-sparql were bumped to 0.18.so.0 (from 0.16.so.0) without
announcement, and without all dependent packages being successfully
rebuilt. At least the following still depend on the old sparql library:
I'll see if I can get any of them rebuilt.
What does it take for people to handle soname bumps properly?
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
Is anyone interested in taking on python-boto, please?
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [pkgdb] python-boto ownership changed
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 00:19:48 +0000
From: Fedora PackageDB <pkgdb(a)fedoraproject.org>
Package python-boto in Fedora 18 was orphaned by robert
To make changes to this package see: