Hi all,
I created a new review request ( yad program -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683150)
This is my first package. So, if possible, could someone sponsor me?
Best Regards,
--
Elder Marco
GNU/Linux User: #471180
"Contra o positivismo, que pára perante os fenômenos e diz: 'Há apenas
fatos', eu digo: 'Ao contrário, fatos é o que não há; há apenas
interpretações'. "(Nietzsche)
Thanks Damian,and I will update my package this evening.
-----------------------------------
年艳川
基础软件事业本部 技术服务部
中科方德软件有限公司(基础软件国家工程研究中心)
北京海淀区中关村南四街4号
Mail: yanchuan(a)nfs-china.com
MSN: nianyanchuan(a)hotmail.com
Mobile: 13426012116
在 2011-06-26, Sun, 21:55:37 ,Damian L Brasher 写到:
(From digest - I have since switched digest off so I generate threaded responses) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:39:20 +0100 From: Damian L Brasher Subject: Self Introduction >>Yanchuan wrote: >> >> Thanks to someone who will review my first package. >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714491 >> That's all.Thanks. >> Yanchuan >I'll work on providing you some review feedback - ready for next >weekend, this will be my first - I still have some Fedora packaging >reading to do (aside from my own submissions). >Best Regards >Damian I have provided you some informal review feedback. Damian Brasher -- Interlinux Engineering Foundation http://www.interlinux.org.uk Central, non-trading, administration, governance and dissemination of foundation intellectual property and know-how. -- devel mailing list devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Very appreciate it, thanks a lot, Tim!
Hurry
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 21:52 +0000, devel-request(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
wrote:
> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:45:14 +0200
> From: "tim.lauridsen(a)gmail.com" <tim.lauridsen(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Package Review Needed
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> <devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:13 PM, He Rui <rhe(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 12:00 +0000,
> devel-request(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > wrote:
> >> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:15:15 +0800
> >> From: He Rui <rhe(a)redhat.com>
> >> Subject: Package Review Needed
> >> To: devel <devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> >>
> >> Greetings!
> >>
> >>
> >> Could someone please review the following ticket? I'll be happy to
> >> swap
> >> reviews.:)
> >>
> >> tinymce - Web based Javascript HTML WYSIWYG editor:
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608574
> >>
> >>
> >> The Fedora QA team is interested in exploring nitrate to replace
> our
> >> use
> >> of wiki for managing test results from community test events, and
> >> currently the Nitrate package is under reviewing[1], which however
> has
> >> dependencies on the tinymce package. Thus it will be very
> appreciated
> >> if
> >> someone can offer help on it.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Many thanks,
> >> Hurry
> >
> >
> > Please notice that I'm still in need of this review, This
> application is
> > the text editor control integrated into the Nitrate TCMS system
> which
> > will be adopted by Fedora qa.
> >
> > Please help!!
> >
> > --
> > Contacts
> >
> > Hurry
> > FAS Name: Rhe
> > Timezone: UTC+8
> > TEL: 86-010-62608141
> > IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh
> >
> > --
> > devel mailing list
> > devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >
>
> I will review it .
>
> Tim
--
Contacts
Hurry
FAS Name: Rhe
Timezone: UTC+8
TEL: 86-010-62608141
IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh
Hi,
currently the existence of RPATHS is only checked when one does a local
rpm build. mock and koji still let it slide. As a result we have these bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703636https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716572
I provided a patch for the first one and even applied for package commit
access to apply the fix, yet the maintainers choose to ignore me.
Forcing the rpath checker on the build system would at least prevent
such problems from happening in the future.
I don't want to be pointing fingers, but it seems like a long time
problem that some @redhat maintainers happily choose to ignore packaging
guidelines [1] without consequences.
Julian
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath
(From digest - I have since switched digest off so I generate threaded
responses)
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:39:20 +0100
From: Damian L Brasher <fedora(a)interlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Self Introduction
>>Yanchuan wrote:
>>
>> Thanks to someone who will review my first package.
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714491
>> That's all.Thanks.
>> Yanchuan
>I'll work on providing you some review feedback - ready for next
>weekend, this will be my first - I still have some Fedora packaging
>reading to do (aside from my own submissions).
>Best Regards
>Damian
I have provided you some informal review feedback.
Damian Brasher
--
Interlinux Engineering Foundation http://www.interlinux.org.uk
Central, non-trading, administration, governance and dissemination of
foundation intellectual property and know-how.
Hi
Seems like the abrt retrace server is not part of Fedora infrastructure
yet and is constantly overloaded and I haven't had a single instance
where it did what it is supposed to do yet. What is the status of this?
Rahul