is this me or koji?
by victor
Ok; I can submit builds, but this failed for me and I don't know why, here's the log
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=778765&name=build.log
======================
ENTER do(['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bs --target i386 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/olpcsound.spec'], False, '/var/lib/mock/dist-olpc3-build-240327-43916/root/', None, 0, True, 0, 101, 102, None, logger=<mock.trace_decorator.getLog object at 0x2b25e6985f50>)
Executing command: ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bs --target i386 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/olpcsound.spec']
/etc/profile: line 38: /bin/hostname: No such file or directory
sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
warning:
Could not canonicalize hostname: x86-7.fedora.phx.redhat.com
Building target platforms: i386
Building for target i386
Wrote: /builddir/build/SRPMS/olpcsound-5.08.92-9.olpc3.src.rpm
LEAVE do -->
========================
No python?
Any suggestions very welcome.
Victor
15 years, 8 months
upcoming varnish-2.0, or running a test suite that starts and connects to a daemon
by Ingvar Hagelund
varnish is a high performance http accellerator.
http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/
This is a posting about packaging varnish-2.0-prebeta-something. It is
also a posting about strange behaviour in rpmbuild.
It has been a while since varnish-1.1.x was submitted to Fedora, and a
lot of people have asked for newer versions. Now, 2.0 is only a few days
(read weeks) from release, and tech previews and betas are more or less
available. So, I have started touching up the specfile for a Fedora
release. I will probably submit the first public beta to rawhide, and
perhaps push it for EPEL, and follow upstream till and through 2.0.
In the following, the source used is a tarball from a svn checkout from
trunk, generated for example like this:
svn co http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/svn/trunk/varnish-cache
tar cvzf varnish-cache.tar.gz varnish-cache
The specfile used is based on the one used in Fedora for 1.1.x. It can
be downloaded here:
http://init.linpro.no/ingvar/varnish/varnish.spec
Per default, it builds a working pre-alpha version of varnish 2.0.
varnish-2.0 has a test suite. It is ran by 'make check'. The test suite
runs a series of tests that checks if the build works as expected. Most
of the tests starts a server at port 9080 and 9081, and runs some tests
against the ports, parsing the output.
Now, running 'make check' from a interactive shell on a Fedora 9 system
works more or less as it should. It fails on one of the 72 tests on my
intel/i386 box, and passes all the testes on my AMD based box. That is
food for the upstream guys.
But when I run the test suite from within rpmbuild, most of the tests
fails or hangs every time, and the problem seems to be related to some
missing communication between the test scripts and the test server process.
The problem is not related to selinux.
Is it possible at all to run this kind of tests from within rpmbuild?
If so, I would be grateful if someone gave advice and/or had a look at
the problem. The make check command is ready for decommenting in the
specfile.
Ingvar
15 years, 8 months
CVS still down?
by Peter Lemenkov
Hello All!
Subj:
[petro@Sulaco flashrom]$ cvs -t up
-> main loop with CVSROOT=:ext:peter@cvs.fedora.redhat.com:/cvs/extras
-> Starting server: ssh -l peter cvs.fedora.redhat.com cvs server
Permission denied (publickey).
cvs [update aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any)
-> Lock_Cleanup()
[petro@Sulaco flashrom]$
--
With best regards!
15 years, 8 months
Warning: Email bounces from Saturday August 16th until Tuesday August 19th 2008
by Seth Vidal
Brief explanation:
For a number of addresses @fedoraproject.org there were windows when
those email addresses would have bounced reporting that the address did
not exist. This happened as a result of the re-installation of the mail
forwarding server. Please check all mailing list subscriptions to make
sure you have not been inadvertently unsubscribed or disabled due to
this error.
Gory Details:
During it's re-installation the postfix mail server was installed but
it was not configured in the alternatives system so that
its /usr/bin/newaliases command was the one being run. As a result
sendmail's newaliases command was being run and it was changing the
permissions of the aliases file such that postfix could not read it. It
did not get noticed until Tuesday due to other issues taking precedence.
The alias-generation would run once every 30 minutes. Breaking the
aliases. Then our configuration management system would run on a
slightly out-of-pace schedule with the aliases and correct the
permissions.
This problem has been corrected, sorry for the inconvenience.
-sv
--
I only speak for me.
Friends don't let Friends use Sendmail
_______________________________________________
Fedora-devel-announce mailing list
Fedora-devel-announce(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce
15 years, 8 months
FAS vs new email
by Mike Chambers
I don't think I ever changed my email on my FAS account and have since
got a new one (happned month or two ago I guess). I can't login now
obviously due to the infastructure scenario and the password reset,
which my email is needed for the password reset. Can someone change my
email for me, or my password so I can change it?
Sorry if wrong place, wasn't sure where to go to ask for help.
--
Mike Chambers
Fedora Project - Ambassador, Bug Zapper, Tester, User, etc..
mikec302(a)fedoraproject.org
15 years, 8 months
Zabbix 1.5.4 RPMs
by Jeffrey Ollie
I've built some RPMs for Zabbix 1.5.4. The major changes:
* There's a new component - the proxy.
* Server and proxy binaries are built for all three databases that
Zabbix supports (MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite3). You choose between
databases by installing the appropriate subpackage. Unless you force
and install it shouldn't be possible to install more than one at a
time.
* The 'zabbix' RPM does not contain the server, instead it contains
bits that are common to all of the packages.
* There should be conflicts and obsoletes that are set to get
everything working on a upgrade, but that's not tested.
* The cpustats patch has been disabled (but it's included in the SRPM)
because it causes the agent to segfault. I had to resolve some
conflicts to get it to apply cleanly to 1.5.4 and I must have messed
something up.
RPMs and SRPMs can be found here for EL-5 and development:
http://repo.ocjtech.us/zabbix/
A git repo with my work on the cpustats branch can be found in the
cpustats branch:
git://fedorapeople.org/~jcollie/zabbix.git
We're looking at using Zabbix 1.6 in Fedora Infrastructure so these
packages will get some thrashing but the more people that look it over
the better. Hopefully some smart person out there will figure out
what I've done to the cpustats patch and get it fixed up.
Jeff
15 years, 8 months
Package Review SIG
by Jason L Tibbitts III
I would like to begin organizing a SIG for package reviews and the
issues surrounding them. I spent a couple of minutes to create
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Package_Review and put in a couple
of tidbits. Everyone is welcome; interested parties should respond
here or, if you wish, privately to me.
Organization is not a particularly strong suit of mine, so I
particularly welcome anyone who is willing to step up and help me get
this thing rolling.
- J<
15 years, 8 months
ssh host keys changed?
by Gerd Hoffmann
Hi folks,
zweiblum kraxel ~# ssh fedorapeople.org
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@ WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY!
Someone could be eavesdropping on you right now (man-in-the-middle attack)!
It is also possible that the RSA host key has just been changed.
The fingerprint for the RSA key sent by the remote host is
07:d4:02:db:9f:70:d5:2d:7f:1b:6a:df:83:73:95:1d.
Please contact your system administrator.
For Fedora Hosted a new ssh fingerprint was announced two days ago. Not
so for Fedora People though. Any info on this one? Should I be worried?
cheers,
Gerd
15 years, 8 months
what is gencert?
by victor
I have logged into my fedora account to see if I can send
my key again and it asked me to download gencert, which
I did?
Now what should I do with it?
Victor Lazzarini
Music Technology Laboratory
Music Department
National University of Ireland, Maynooth
15 years, 8 months