Greetings.
I thought I would let everyone know that I have moved all the buildvm-a64
instances from some older hardware (lenovo emags) to newer hardware
(altra Mt. Snow). This should result in a noticable speed increase
along with allowing us to increase density of vm's per host.
If you notice any issues with buildvm-a64 machines, please file an
infrastructure ticket: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Thanks,
kevin
There will be an outage starting at 2022-09-26/2022-09-27 21:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 4 hours on 2022-09-26 and 5 hours on 2022-09-27.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2022-09-26 21:00UTC'
date -d '2022-09-27 21:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
On 2022-09-26 internet edge routers and switches will be upgraded. During this time period various
Fedora services will be down as switches and routers are rebooted.
On 2022-09-27 1gb internal switches will be upgraded. a 30min outage is likely during this time period.
Affected Services:
All services at the IAD2 datacenter
Ticket Link:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10915
Please join #fedora-admin or #fedora-noc on irc.libera.chat
or add comments to the ticket for this outage above.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/swig410
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
== Summary ==
Update the SWIG in Fedora to the latest version 4.1.0. New version
should be released in [https://github.com/swig/swig/milestone/3
October 2nd 2022]. See
[https://github.com/swig/swig/blob/master/CHANGES.current
CHANGES.current] for more details about new release.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Jplesnik| Jitka Plesníková]]
* Email: <jplesnik(a)redhat.com>
== Current status ==
* [https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jplesnik/swig-rebuild/ Copr
repository] with the latest version of SWIG 4.1.0
* [https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jplesnik/swig-rebuild/monitor/
Current status] of SWIG's dependencies
* I checked the errors and reported them to SWIG upstream/package
upstream/fedora maintainers.
* Issues related to SWIG 4.1.0
** [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128029 COPASI BZ] -
upstream fix
** [https://gitlab.com/graphviz/graphviz/-/issues/2277 graphviz] -
related to PHP wrapper change
** [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128661 kicad BZ] - upstream fix
** [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127964 libCombine BZ]
- upstream fix
** libkolabxml - related to PHP wrapper change
** [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127978 libnuml BZ] -
upstream fix
** [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128592 libsbml BZ] -
patch attached
** [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127982 libsedml BZ] -
upstream fix
** [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128646 lldb BZ] -
patch attached
** [https://github.com/mltframework/mlt/issues/820 mlt] - related to
PHP wrapper change
** [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128189 nordugrid-arc
BZ] - patch attached
** [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128024 subversion BZ]
- upstream fix
== Detailed Description ==
SWIG-4.1.0 summary:
* Add PHP 8 support.
* PHP wrapping is now done entirely via PHP's C API - no more .php wrapper.
** the change breaks build of graphviz, libkolabxml and mlt - it
requires update of code and spec file to not install *.php files
* Perl 5.8.0 is now the oldest version SWIG supports.
* Python 3.3 is now the oldest Python 3 version SWIG supports.
* Common cases of `<` and `>` comparisons in constant expressions are
now supported.
* The "XML" target language has been reclassified as "Experimental".
== Benefit to Fedora ==
Provides the latest SWIG version to developers.
== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: Check Koschei status. Test with latest version to
ensure compatibility. Work with upstream on bug fixing.
* Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Release engineering:
* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
N/A (not a System Wide Change)
== How To Test ==
The SWIG dependencies are monitored by Koschei, see the
[https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/groups/swig Koschei SWIG group]
== User Experience ==
Developers will have the benefit of using the latest SWIG version.
== Dependencies ==
[https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/swig-4.1.0/swig-deps The list of
packages] which are using SWIG for build.
== Contingency Plan ==
* Contingency mechanism: (What to do? Who will do it?) N/A (not a
System Wide Change) <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
* Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change) <!-- REQUIRED
FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
* Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change), Yes/No <!-- REQUIRED
FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
== Documentation ==
N/A (not a System Wide Change)
== Release Notes ==
SWIG-4.1.0 summary:
* Add PHP 8 support.
* PHP wrapping is now done entirely via PHP's C API - no more .php wrapper.
* Perl 5.8.0 is now the oldest version SWIG supports.
* Python 3.3 is now the oldest Python 3 version SWIG supports.
* Common cases of < and > comparisons in constant expressions are now supported.
* The "XML" target language has been reclassified as "Experimental".
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php82
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
== Summary ==
Update the PHP stack in Fedora to the latest version 8.2.x
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Remi| Remi Collet]] and [[SIGs/PHP|PHP SIG]]
* Email: remi at fedoraproject dot org
== Detailed Description ==
Update the PHP stack in Fedora to latest version 8.2.x.
Fedora has a 6 months cycle, PHP a 1 year cycle, our common practice
for some years:
* 2 Fedora cycles for each PHP minor release (exceptions below)
* 3 Fedora cycles for latest minor (e.g. 5.6 or 7.4) to give more time
before next major
* 1 Fedora cycle for first major (e.g. 7.0 or 8.0)
== Benefit to Fedora ==
Provides the latest PHP version to developers and system administrators.
== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: Check Koschei status. Test with latest version to
ensure compatibility. Work with upstream on bug fixing. Needed mass
rebuild (C extensions) done by change owner.
* Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Release engineering:
* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
N/A (not a System Wide Change)
== How To Test ==
* The PHP stack (extensions and libraries) are monitored by Koschei,
see the [https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/groups/php?order_by=state%2C-started
Koschei PHP group]
* install and play with your web applications
== User Experience ==
Developers and system administrators will have the great benefit or
running the latest PHP version.
== Dependencies ==
All php-* packages (and some *-php)
== Contingency Plan ==
* Contingency mechanism: Drop not compatible packages.
Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Blocks release? N/A
* Blocks product?
== Documentation ==
* [https://raw.githubusercontent.com/php/php-src/PHP-8.2/UPGRADING UPGRADING]
* [https://raw.githubusercontent.com/php/php-src/PHP-8.2/UPGRADING.INTERNALS
UPGRADING.INTERNALS]
== Release Notes ==
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the immediate availability
of Fedora Linux 37 Beta, the next step towards our planned Fedora
Linux 37 release at the end of October.
Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site:
* Get Fedora 37 Beta Workstation: https://getfedora.org/workstation/download/
* Get Fedora 37 Beta Server: https://getfedora.org/server/download/
* Get Fedora 37 IoT: https://getfedora.org/iot/download/
Or, check out one of our popular variants, including KDE Plasma, Xfce,
and other desktop environments:
* Get Fedora 37 Beta Spins: https://spins.fedoraproject.org/prerelease
* Get Fedora 37 Beta Labs: https://labs.fedoraproject.org/prerelease
## Beta Release Highlights
# Gnome 43
# Retire ARMv7
# Python 3.11, Perl 5.36, Golang 1.19
# RPM content is now signed with IMA signatures
For more details about the release, read the full announcement at
* https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-37-beta/
or look for the prerelease pages in the download sections at
* https://getfedora.org/
Since this is a Beta release, we expect that you may encounter bugs or
missing features. To report issues encountered during testing, contact
the Fedora QA team via the test(a)lists.fedoraproject.org mailing list or
in #fedora-qa on Libera Chat or the #qa:fedoraproject.org Matrix room.
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
== Summary ==
Make DNF5 the new default packaging tool. The change will replace DNF,
LIBDNF, and DNF-AUTOMATIC with the new DNF5 and new Libdnf5 library.
It is a second step after
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MajorUpgradeOfMicrodnf.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:jmracek| Jaroslav Mracek]]
* Email: jmracek(a)redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
The new DNF5 will provide a significant improvement in user
experiences and performance. The replacement is the second step in
upgrade of Fedora Software Management stack. Without the change there
will be multiple software management tool (DNF5, old Microdnf,
PackageKit, and DNF) based on different libraries (libdnf, libdnf5),
providing a different behavior, and not sharing a history. We can also
expect that DNF will have only limited support from upstream. The DNF5
development was announced on
[https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org…
Fedora-Devel] list in 2020.
=== New DNF5 Features ===
* Fully featured package manager without requirement of Python
** Smaller system
** Faster
** Replace DNF and Microdnf
* Unified behavior of in the software management stack
** New Libdnf5 plugins (C++, Python) will be applicable to DNF5, Dnf5Daemon
*** DNF4 plugins were not applicable for PackageKit and Microdnf (e.g.
versionlock, subscription-manager), therefore PackageKit behaves
differently in comparison to DNF
** Shared configurations
*** In DNF4 not all configuration is honored by PackageKit and Microdnf
** DNF/YUM was developed for decades with impact of multiple styles
and naming conventions (options, configuration, options, commands)
* New Daemon
** The new daemon can provide an alternative to PackageKit for RPMs
(only one backend of PackageKit) if it will be integrated into Desktop
** Support of Modularity and Comps group
* Performance improvement
** Loading of repositories
** Advisory operations
** RPM queries
*** Name filters with a case-insensitive search (the `repoquery` command)
** Smart sharing of metadata between dnf5 and daemon
*** Reduce disk and downloads requirements
*** Currently, DNF, Microdnf, and PackageKit use their own cache
*** Optional, may be not available for Fedora 39
* Decrease of a maintenance cost in the long term
** Shared plugins
** Removal of functional duplicates
* Fully integrated Modularity in LIBDNF5 workflows
** The Modularity is supported in DNF and LIBDNF but it is not fully
integrated. Integration was not possible due to limitation of
compatibility with other tools (PackageKit)
** Fully integrated Modularity required changes in the library workflow
=== Major codebase improvements ===
*Reports in structure
** DNF reports a lot of important information only in logs
* Removal of duplicated implementation
** LIBDNF evolved from LIBHIF (PackageKit library) and HAWKEY (DNF
library). The integration was never finished, therefore LIBDNF still
contains duplicated functionality.
** decrease of the code maintenance cost in future
* Unify Python bindings
** Formal Libdnf provides two types of Python bindings
*** CPython (hawkey)
*** SWIG (libdnf)
** Maintaining and communication between both bindings requires a lot
of resources
** Binding unification was not possible without breaking API compatibility
* SWIG bindings
** With SWIG we can generate additional bindings without spending huge resources
** Code in particular languages will be very similar to each other
* Separation of system state from history DB and `/etc/dnf/module.d`
** In dnf-4 the list of userinstalled packages and list of installed
groups along with the lists of packages installed from them is
computed as an aggregation of transaction history. In dnf5 it will be
stored separately, having multiple benefits, among them that the
history database will serve for informational purposes only and will
not define the state of the system (it gets corrupted occasionally
etc.).
** Data stored in `/etc/dnf/module.d` were not supposed to be user
modifiable and their format is not sufficient (missing information
about installed packages with installed profiles)
*** Content of `/etc/dnf/module.d` will be moved into the System State
== Feedback ==
== Benefit to Fedora ==
== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
DNF5 is still in the development and some of the features or options
are not yet available. We still have to finish the implementation of
Modularity, storing internal data related to History and System State,
and also documentation and man pages. DNF5 can be tested from
repository with upstream nightly builds -
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf5-unstable/.
The project's github repository is here -
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/
* Other developers:
* Release engineering: [https://pagure.io/releng/issues #Releng issue number]
* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Alignment with Objectives:
== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
The new DNF5 will obsolete `dnf`, `yum`, `dnf-automatic`, `yum-utils`,
and DNF plugins (core and extras). python3-dnf and LIBDNF (`libdnf`,
`python3-hawkey`) will be obsoleted by `fedora-obsolete-packages`.
=== Compatibility ===
The new DNF5 will provide a symlink to `/usr/bin/dnf` therefore users
will see the replacement as an upgrade of DNF with limited but
documented syntax changes. The DNF5 will provide some compatible
aliases of commands and options to improve adoption of the DNF5.
== How To Test ==
Install `dnf5` package from
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf5-unstable/
== User Experience ==
* Improved progress bars
* Improved transaction table
* Transaction progress reports including scriptlets reports
* Support of local rpm for transaction operation
* Great bash completion (better then DNF has)
* New commands and options that are only available with `DNF`
== Dependencies ==
There is a long list of dependent packages
=== dnf ===
auter
calamares
copr-builder
cpanspec
dnf-plugin-diff
dnfdragora
etckeeper-dnf
fedora-review
fedora-upgrade
kiwi-systemdeps-core
libdnf-plugin-subscription-manager
lpf
mock
osbuild
perl-CPAN-Plugin-Sysdeps
policycoreutils-devel
rbm
subscription-manager
supermin
system-config-language
=== python3-dnf ===
anaconda-core
dnf-plugin-ovl
dnfdaemon
fedora-easy-karma
fedora-review
lorax
mock-core-configs
module-build-service
modulemd-tools
needrestart
pungi
python3-bodhi-client
python3-dnf-plugin-cow
python3-dnf-plugin-flunk_dependent_remove
python3-imgcreate
python3-libreport
retrace-server
system-config-language
=== libdnf ===
PackageKit
copr-builder
gnome-software-rpm-ostree
libdnf-plugin-subscription-manager
libdnf-plugin-swidtags
libdnf-plugin-txnupd
=== python3-hawkey ===
mock-core-configs
modulemd-tools
python3-rpmdeplint
retrace-server
== Contingency Plan ==
* Contingency mechanism: (What to do? Who will do it?)
* Contingency deadline:
* Blocks release?
== Documentation ==
none
== Release Notes ==
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsRepackaging
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
== Summary ==
We are reworking the Node.js packaging to make Node.js versions
available as parallel-installable packages.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:SGallagh| Stephen Gallagher]]
* Email: sgallagh(a)redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
We will be creating the packages nodejs-16, nodejs-18 and (in April)
nodejs-20. These packages will be parallel-installable (with the
exception of the -devel subpackages) and provide
`/usr/bin/node-$MAJOR`. We will also take advantage of the
`alternatives` subsystem to populate `/usr/bin/node` from the default
Node.js version for that release, or if the default is not installed,
the highest currently-installed version.
Notes:
* The default in Fedora 38 will be Node.js 18. If a user was to
install Node.js 16 and Node.js 20, but not Node.js 18, then Node.js 20
would provide `/usr/bin/node`
* The policy going forward will be to have the most recently-released
version of Node.js at the time of Fedora's expected Beta release date
be the default for that release throughout its lifetime.
== Feedback ==
[https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.or…
Mailing list thread]
Neal Gompa raised the question of using a subpackage to own
`/usr/bin/node` instead of using the `alternatives` subsystem, citing
python as an example. My response was that the problem with this is
that I want `/usr/bin/node` to always be available so long as any
`nodejs-$MAJOR` version is installed. It also ensures that the
`node(1)` manpage always matches the `/usr/bin/node` executable.
== Benefit to Fedora ==
=== User Benefits ===
* Provides a simple way to have a different (or multiple) Node.js
interpreters on their system. No dealing with Modularity.
* Enables multiple versions of Node.js on the system (can test code
against different versions without using containers)
=== Packager Benefits ===
* No more modules to maintain.
* Availability of multiple Node.js versions in the buildroot means
that other `nodejs-*` packages can test against multiple supported
options.
== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
The packaging work is done and can be played with at
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sgallagh/nodejs-alternatives/
today.
* Other developers:
There should be no need to change any dependent packages, though
packagers of Node.js software may wish to take advantage of the
testing opportunities afforded.
* Release engineering:
* Policies and guidelines: We will be updating the Node.js Packaging
Guidelines with the new best practices.
* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Alignment with Objectives: N/A
== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
Systems using the existing nodejs RPM package will be upgraded to the
matching `nodejs-$MAJOR` version. Work is pending on how to migrate
users of Modular Node.js to the new packages.
== How To Test ==
== User Experience ==
Done correctly, this should be handled entirely without the user's
need to know about it.
== Dependencies ==
== Contingency Plan ==
* Contingency mechanism: (What to do? Who will do it?) N/A (not a
System Wide Change)
* Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change)
== Documentation ==
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.or…
== Release Notes ==
Multiple releases of Node.js may now be installed in parallel from the
Fedora repositories.
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis