Reminder: WG meeting tomorrow (Wed 2015-Sep-30) at 1400 UTC/10:00am US-EDT.
Sorry for sending this agenda notice late. We have a couple items to discuss as far as I can tell:
* Utilities folder entries -- who is creating downstream patch(es)?
* Re: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266569 -- user agent issue -- what if anything do we need to notify users about here? (Preferably this should go in release notes)
If you have additions to the agenda, please submit them to this thread by 30 minutes before tomorrow's meeting. Thanks and sorry again for the delay.
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 11:35 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Reminder: WG meeting tomorrow (Wed 2015-Sep-30) at 1400 UTC/10:00am US-EDT.
Sorry for sending this agenda notice late. We have a couple items to discuss as far as I can tell:
Utilities folder entries -- who is creating downstream patch(es)?
Re: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266569 -- user
agent issue -- what if anything do we need to notify users about here? (Preferably this should go in release notes)
If you have additions to the agenda, please submit them to this thread by 30 minutes before tomorrow's meeting. Thanks and sorry again for the delay.
Not necessarily for tomorrow, but could we get an update on the progress towards a graphical upgrade tool in Fedora 24 at some point?
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 11:35 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
If you have additions to the agenda, please submit them to this thread by 30 minutes before tomorrow's meeting. Thanks and sorry again for the delay.
We should probably talk about flat volumes [1].
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:06:51AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 11:35 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
If you have additions to the agenda, please submit them to this thread by 30 minutes before tomorrow's meeting. Thanks and sorry again for the delay.
We should probably talk about flat volumes [1].
I usually like to have agenda items that are specific questions we need to decide. Here it looks to be, "Are we going to disable flat volumes in PulseAudio?".
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 11:35 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
- Utilities folder entries -- who is creating downstream patch(es)?
I've done a new build of Disks for f23-gnome.
I got a permission denied error when I tried to push my changes for Characters. Hey Daiki, can you visit [1] and add commit ACLs for the user group::gnome-sig? I'm trying to add patches [2] and [3] but don't have permission. Thanks!
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/gnome-characters/ [2] https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-characters/patch/?id=18e332c7764 7410eeaa010c9b0eeda6e65669850 [3] https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-characters/patch/?id=2817e1e6431 f0b88aad3f63a3881afc37340dcc1
Hi, I have been meaning to bring the following topic up for a while now.
- GUI for langpack installation
I'd like to have some discussion about UX of/UI for the installation of langpacks. Jiri and I discussed this a little at FUDcon Pune, where he told me it is a problem for users of libreoffice etc since we don't ship langpacks in the Workstation Live image or have a nice way to get them installed post-installation.
Currently users can do it by hand by running "dnf langinstall".
We could also discuss this first on list. In that case I could start a new thread.
From the GNOME UX point of view perhaps handling it in gnome-initial-setup would be the most natural since initial user language setup is done there. (On the downside this would not help non-GNOME users, but probably it is good enough approach for Fedora Workstation. The real problem may be if upstream would accept such a feature there.)
Maybe there is a better approach? For example in gnome-software?
Jens
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 06:08:49PM +0900, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
Hi, I have been meaning to bring the following topic up for a while now.
- GUI for langpack installation
I'd like to have some discussion about UX of/UI for the installation of langpacks. Jiri and I discussed this a little at FUDcon Pune, where he told me it is a problem for users of libreoffice etc since we don't ship langpacks in the Workstation Live image or have a nice way to get them installed post-installation.
Currently users can do it by hand by running "dnf langinstall".
We could also discuss this first on list. In that case I could start a new thread.
That's the best course right now, since it's not clear what we can decide in a meeting yet.
From the GNOME UX point of view perhaps handling it in gnome-initial-setup would be the most natural since initial user language setup is done there. (On the downside this would not help non-GNOME users, but probably it is good enough approach for Fedora Workstation. The real problem may be if upstream would accept such a feature there.)
Maybe there is a better approach? For example in gnome-software?
On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 08:17 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
That's the best course right now, since it's not clear what we can decide in a meeting yet.
The solution is clear to me. :) g-i-s and g-c-c should install relevant language packs when a new language is selected and enabled. Folks, does this sound sane?
desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Jens-Ulrik Petersen -
Michael Catanzaro -
Paul W. Frields -
Stephen Gallagher