On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 11:10 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Elad Alfassa (elad(a)fedoraproject.org) said:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > A later refinement would be to actually define the list of supported
> > languages, based on some criteria (e.g. >= 80% translated). When we have
> > that, we can include only fonts and input methods for supported
> > languages.
> That doesn't really work. People whose language doesn't have an active
> translation team would still want to email their friends in their native
> language, or browse websites written in that language.
I can see why we wouldn't necessarily want to remove support for a language
with sparse translations (assuming it *works*), I think it's still a
worthwhile effort to track the translation and input status for languages so
we can properly inform users what languages do have first-class support.
Transifex already does this:
the front page has translation completion percentage for all modules
combined. Front pages for each individual module give percentages for
that module. Of course, this is for Fedora modules - things like
anaconda, the release notes, etc - but that's all we can realistically
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net