On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 11:37 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 11:35 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> Oh I see, I was wrong; yes David was talking about automatically killing
> all processes. That is wrong, I agree with you.
Care to explain why this is wrong?
See my other mail.
> As Havoc said, having them connect to X11 or DBus, or using a
babysitter
> that does is the right way.
So in order to avoid having a process linger we now need to patch it?
Good luck with that....
Don't need luck in the original case you were talking about, just an
editor and commit access to the upstream =)
Here's a patch for GConf: