-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/05/2014 09:20 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Stephen Gallagher
<sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/04/2014 09:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> This with my Personal Opinion hat on, not representing QA:
>>
>> I'm not sure all/most people who actually want to use Fedora
>> KDE are likely to be sold on doing it by downloading what they
>> will see as 'GNOME', installing that, and then installing KDE
>> on top of it. I think this will be fine for some folks, but
>> there'll be a significant constituency which just wants a KDE
>> image.
>>
>> In fact we might be creating a bit of a problem, because I can
>> see both "want KDE as an alternative desktop on top of the
>> Workstation product" and "just want Fedora KDE" as two entirely
>> legitimate and viable constituencies, which sort of means we've
>> just created a bunch of extra work for ourselves. I'm not sure
>> I see a clever magical solution to that, though. Engage brain
>> cells...
>>
>
> I'd suggest that for the Fedora Workstation, we declare that KDE
> is release-blocking *as an optional component atop the
> Workstation*.
Please explain this further. Having an optional component be
release blocking is making my head hurt.
What I mean is that if I boot the live media, install from it and
select "KDE" during that install process, then having a usable system
after the post-install reboot is blocking.
Is that more clear?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlMXM50ACgkQeiVVYja6o6MsfQCcCgZ4UR80iI1d/WerzYQaPlMK
UrQAmgOmzsNwx6lIEa7CTxJIQQPzeJtb
=Z+7b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----