On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 17:23 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 11:10 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 16:14 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> > Not in the least, there are programs which are supposed to stay running
> > even when you log out -- screen, vncserver, nohup'ed processes etc.
>
> No one is talking about changing the semantics of "nohup".
Perhaps I'm a bit slow, but how would it not do this if it relies on the
inheritance of a previously non-existent environment variable that needs
to be deleted if a process shall not be killed on session exit?
Oh I see, I was wrong; yes David was talking about automatically killing
all processes. That is wrong, I agree with you.
As Havoc said, having them connect to X11 or DBus, or using a babysitter
that does is the right way.