On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Josh Boyer (jwboyer(a)fedoraproject.org) said:
> > Basically, what I'm saying is that if Desktop would be OK with using
> > xfs-on-LVM as default with all choices demoted to custom partitioning
> > (no dropdown), as Server has currently agreed on, that'd be great. Or if
> > we could otherwise achieve agreement on something.
> I'll bring it up. I believe the momentum on using ext4-on-LVM is that
> it's the existing default, it's a known quantity, and we have the most
> experience with it as a project.
So, we're combining momentum on using the existing default for a Fedora
deliverable and the existing default for a RHEL deliverable to get two
Physics sucks huh? Isn't this what they call an elastic collision?
That's the one where things collide and then go off in different
(I'd note that RHEL Workstation, at least in the beta, defaults
to XFS as
well, although I think that's merely inheriting from the Server cases.)
Fair point. As I said, I'll bring it up.